WEKO3
アイテム
「社会主義経済学」の成立可能性について(下・後編)
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4815
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4815a6c4f07d-7ee4-4f3c-9dc5-8e1e69f0ca18
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-03-21 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 「社会主義経済学」の成立可能性について(下・後編) | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Can a Political Economy of Socialism Come Into Existence? (Part II -2) | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 社会構成体 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | ロシアの伝統 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 過渡期 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 経済的強制 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 景気循環メカニズム | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00240555 | |||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
関連識別子 | 02869721 | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
関連名称 | ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW | |||||
著者 |
上野, 勝男
× 上野, 勝男× Ueno, Katsuo |
|||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||
値 | 桃山学院大学経済学部 | |||||
記事種別(日) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
記事種別(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Article | |||||
抄録(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | To understand socialism or communism as the authentic history of human society, it is essential to comprehensively examine problems that are specific to the period of transition from capitalism to socialism. The transitional period cannot be viewed only from the perspective of "political transformation." Rather, it is also important to examine problems that are specific to socio-economic transformation and to develop an outlook for their resolution. Serious studies of what the socio-economic transformation process in the transitional period looks like has just recently begun. On this subject, I have argued that in the transitional period, it is important to overcome the "economic coercion" that is peculiar to capitalism, as opposed to other social formations where society was ruled through the lever of extra-economic force. In particular, during the socio-economic transformation process, it is important to overcome the cyclical mechanism of the economy or the explosion of economic crisis at the macroscopic level, and also to fundamentally transform the organization of production and labor on the microscopic level to forms that are suited to one's own humanity. The Soviet Union failed in both respects, leaving behind grotesque ruins. Various significant theoretical weaknesses existed that led to this fatal failure. In the Soviet Union, most economists took it granted without any grounds that the "plan vs. market" scheme was correct. In their minds, markets functioned in an anarchical manner that rendered economic crises unavoidable. The logic of the process whereby markets lead ultimately to economic crisis was not fully examined, whereas the explosion of a crisis in capitalism is the end result of a complicated series of mechanisms. Anarchy in the markets per se does not necessarily generate crisis. The primary objective of socialist economic planning should not have been the suppression of markets. The goal should have been to overcome the cyclical mechanisms of the economy. | |||||
書誌情報 |
桃山学院大学経済経営論集 en : ST. ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW 巻 52, 号 1, p. 29-71, 発行日 2010-06-15 |
|||||
表示順 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 2 | |||||
アクセション番号 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | KJ00006467819 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 02869721 |