{"created":"2023-05-15T13:44:23.484320+00:00","id":4443,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"5292ce9e-699d-4c60-a4a0-24f01e5a594e"},"_deposit":{"created_by":3,"id":"4443","owners":[3],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4443"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004443","sets":["43:52:1236"]},"author_link":["7142","7141"],"item_3_biblio_info_12":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2001-01-01","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3","bibliographicPageEnd":"111","bibliographicPageStart":"85","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"42","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"桃山学院大学経済経営論集"},{"bibliographic_title":"ST. ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_3_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Much Leveller activity occured in print. The three leaders(John Lilburne, Richard Overton, William Walwyn) were all from 1646 veteran pamphleteers. And they were soon to become experienced petitioners as well. And they were articulate speakers, with others like John Wildman, Thomas Rainborough and other agitators at Putny Debate (from the end of the October to the beginning of the November 1647) and White Hall Debate (from the end of the December 1648 to the beginning of the January 1649) who faced the Army officers like Oliver Cromwell, Thomas Fairfax and Henry Ireton in debate on the form the English constitution furthermore faith or principle of democracy should take. In the several modes they continually claimed that they sought to persuade others to their views, not to impose them through force of arms: their idea was, as famously put by Walwyn, to 'get victory on the understandings of men'. They set out to persuade their contemporaries of four things: that there must be a program of reform in the church-state; that their should be a new constitution of authority designed to carry out and preserve those reforms; that the conditions were such that this new constitution should, could and must be instituted; and (finally) that the fundamental jural facts about being human justified the reforms, the constitution and its institution.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_15":{"attribute_name":"表示順","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"10","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_16":{"attribute_name":"アクセション番号","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"KJ00005058085","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_8":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論文","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_description_9":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Article","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_source_id_1":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00240555","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_source_id_19":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"02869721","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_3_text_6":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"桃山学院大学社会学部"}]},"item_3_text_7":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"St. Andrew's University"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"村山, 高康"},{"creatorName":"ムラヤマ, タカヤス","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"7141","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"MURAYAMA, Takayasu","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"7142","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2017-03-21"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00005058085.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.5 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KJ00005058085.pdf","url":"https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4443/files/KJ00005058085.pdf"},"version_id":"a2d8f85e-cdc9-4258-b359-383f89b39bb2"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"自然権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"選挙権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"成文憲法","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"パトニー討論","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ホワイトホール討論","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"政治思想の諸相 : ピューリタニズムと近代デモクラシー(蕗谷硯児教授退任記念号)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"政治思想の諸相 : ピューリタニズムと近代デモクラシー(蕗谷硯児教授退任記念号)"},{"subitem_title":"Aspects of a Political Thought : Puritanism and the Modern Democracy(Special Issue Dedicated to Professor Kenji FUKIYA)","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"3","path":["1236"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2017-03-21"},"publish_date":"2017-03-21","publish_status":"0","recid":"4443","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["政治思想の諸相 : ピューリタニズムと近代デモクラシー(蕗谷硯児教授退任記念号)"],"weko_creator_id":"3","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-16T06:35:45.848426+00:00"}