@article{oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009125,
 author = {滕, 媛媛 and 大島, 一二 and TENG, Yuanyuan and OSHIMA, Kazutsugu},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {桃山学院大学経済経営論集, ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {Since the rapid urban growth started in 1990’s, a large number of villages
disappeared, rural land transformed to part of urban area and the villagers
became new urban residents. However, many villagers’ committees still
remain, even there are no longer villagers.
In China, urban areas and rural areas are separated administratively, so
are the urban residents and rural residents as well as their selfgovernment
organizations, the urban residents’ committees and the
villagers’ committees. However, in some newly developed urban areas, the
urban residents’ committees and the villagers’ committees are co-existed.
This paper aims to understand the actual conditions of the villagers’
committees that remain through the urban development. By taking S
villagers’ committee in Nanchang as a case study, the differences between
two different kinds of committees’ roles were examined, as well as the
reasons of their co-existence.
As a result, the duties of S villagers’ committee changed a lot since the
land expropriation. And it is playing an important role in the process of
villagers’ transition to urban residents. The big differences of duties that
irreplaceable between two committees are the function of managing the
communal property and the members of committee, which are the reasons
of their co-existence.},
 pages = {15--27},
 title = {中国の都市化地域における村民委員会の実態 : 江西省南昌市紅谷灘新区の事例},
 volume = {61},
 year = {2020},
 yomi = {オオシマ, カズツグ}
}