@article{oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009348,
 author = {谷口, 照三 and TANIGUCHI, Teruso},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {桃山学院大学経済経営論集, ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {In the modern era, under the slogan of “building a welfare society”, the
production and distribution of wealth through industrialization was
oriented and practiced. Industrialization is a social mechanism of mass
production, mass sale, and mass consumption through organized labor,
which organized factory-based machine production and mass labor, and
was accompanied with not only the “production and distribution of wealth”
but also the “production and distribution of risk”. As a concrete example,
we can raise pollution and global environmental problems, including health
hazards, but also the consequences of too much of a desire for “riches”.
Therefore, we are asked to take the results seriously, reflect deeply, and
take corrective action. It is called “Reflexive Modernization”.
Today, pollution and global environmental problems have triggered
“Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR), “Sustainability”, “the Triple Bottom
Line” (important value to be achieved; “economic value”, “environmental
value”, “social value”) and “Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”, among
others, have become hot topics, and the response to “Reflexive
Modernization” is steadily taking root. And in such responses, what is
expected and focused on by society, among other things, would be
reflection on the management of the individual firms that have been
responsible for industrialization. In this regard, we have seen “CSR
Management”, “Business Ethics” or “Management Ethics”, “Sustainable
Management”, “ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) Management”,
“CSV (Creating Shared Values)”, and the latest “SDGs Management” have
been raised and addressed in both theory and practice.
However, it is hard to deny the reality that these concepts have become
“trendy” before their meanings, their backgrounds, and their ranges have
been sufficiently examined. CSR Management, Sustainable Management,
ESG Management, CSV, and SDGs Management represent the content and
direction of “Reflexive Modernization” at the company level, and “ Business
Ethics”, “Management Ethics” or “Organization Ethics” are the foundation
of this management. However, when asked if there is a theoretical and
systematic development of the distinction between the concepts and their
relation to the degree to which they are talked about, the answer would
have to be no.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the “relationship between
organization moral creation and organization ethics” as a strategic factor in
the actualization of CSR management on the basis of the distinction and
relationship between the concepts of ethics and morality, as well as the
above-mentioned concepts. For that purpose, as the basic thought
framework of this paper, I will first explain the necessity or background of
moral creation under the title of “Environment of Organization Moral
Creation” in section II, and then, in section III, I will discuss the distinction
between organization morality and organization ethics, their
interrelationships, and their dynamism. In IV, I will discuss the creation of
shared value, which builds on these and opens up possibilities for “the
dynamic organizing of responsibility”. And finally, these issues and
concepts are confirmed to be “strategic factors to the realization of CSR
management”.},
 pages = {147--185},
 title = {組織倫理とCSR経営への戦略的要因},
 volume = {62},
 year = {2021},
 yomi = {タニグチ, テルソウ}
}