@article{oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009469,
 author = {上野, 勝男 and UENO, Katsuo},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {桃山学院大学経済経営論集, ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW},
 month = {Jan},
 note = {In the Soviet Union, during the period of Stalinist industrialization and
collectivization of agriculture, large numbers of peasants from rural areas
migrated to cities. This occurred on a scale that can be likened to the
Exodus. Sheila Fitzpatrick pointed out that this was a very similar
phenomenon to what Marx described in his “Primitive Accumulation
Theory of Capital” in Capital and raised the “paradox” that Soviet
collectivization not only drove the peasants to kolkhoz, but also drove them
out of the countryside. The “paradox of collectivization” arose from the fact
that collectivization, on the basis of Marx’s theory, destroyed by force the
“small peasant management” that had traditionally been the mode of life
and livelihood for the peasantry. The collectivization of agriculture was
enforced by treating the wealthy peasant class of diligent farmers in the
village as “enemies of socialism” and by using the bare violence of the state
as leverage for the “extermination of the kulaks as a class. According to V.
P. Danilov’s research, prior to collectivization, the rural society in the NEP
period was undergoing its own changes with contradictions and difficulties.
Although the number of peasants migrating to the cities and industry was
increasing, the structure was not designed to meet immediately the
demand for labor from industrialization, which was rapidly changing gears.
The massive supply of labor was created only when the “small peasant
business” was thoroughly destroyed by forced collectivization with violent
leverage.},
 pages = {181--238},
 title = {「資本の本源的蓄積」とソ連／ロシア(下)-１},
 volume = {63},
 year = {2022},
 yomi = {ウエノ, カツオ}
}