@article{oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009475,
 author = {谷口, 照三 and TANIGUCHI, Teruso},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {桃山学院大学経済経営論集, ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW},
 month = {Feb},
 note = {This paper discusses ethical issues related to ‘the event of a company
running a business’, with a particular focus on the ‘organizational nature’ of
‘the event’, organization ethics, its constitutive content, and the challenges
implied by this subject.
In my paper, “Organization Ethics and Strategic Factors for CSR
Management” (Economics and Business Review , St. Andrew’s University
in Osaka, Japan, Vol. 62, No. 4, March 2021), I have been examining the
importance of organization ethics for the thinking and practice of ‘CSR
management in the context of the SDGs and other issues’. The term ‘SDGs,
etc.’ refers to Sustainability, the Triple Bottom Line as its ideological goals
(the layered economic, environmental, and social values to be achieved), and
the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are the concrete action
goals of Sustainability. There, CSR is understood directly and concretely as
‘management that develops the social responsibility of the company’, and
more generally and abstractly as ‘management that develops the social
responsibility of the organization or cooperative system’, in other words, I
placed the meaning of Organization Ethics (OE) as the ‘core’ of the means
to achieve this.
In the process, the concepts of Ethics for Organization (EFO), Ethics of
Organization (EOO), and the creation of Organization Moral (OM) have
been used and examined. The foundation of my research here is the
‘standpoint of action-subject existence’. The fundamental characteristic of
this approach is that we understand the acting subject as a ‘self-creating
creature’ that creates itself while being created by the environment, in a
continuous process of ‘becoming to be and being a new becoming’. 
A simpler way to describe it is that it is basically an upward circulation
process between ‘outside-in’ and ‘inside-out’. It is the ‘Creation of
Organization Morality’ that acts as a mediator between the first two and
serves as an opportunity to form the latter process. ‘Ethics for
Organizations’ is the object (or it would be said, more accurately, the
opportunity) to ‘bringing the outside-in’, and ‘Ethics of Organizations’ is
that of ‘bringing the inside-out’. If there is an ‘Establishment of
Organization Ethics (EFO+EOO=OE)’, and if the cycle forms an upward
cyclical process triggered by the progressive creation of ‘Organization
Morality’, then the ‘Deepening of Organization Ethics’ would become an
actuality. Furthermore, I have confirmed in my previous paper that this
process plays an extremely important role in connecting existing or past
CSR management with the new CSR management.
It is clear that such a function depends on the content of the
composition. Also, the content of the composition will have an impact on
our lives, the way we live, and the way society is organized. This paper
will deal with these issues. First, the discussion of this paper will be
developed by presenting and explaining the constitutive content of
Organization Ethics, namely ‘Organization Belief (O)’, ‘Ethics of Concern as
an Object of Business (C)’, ‘Engineering Ethics(E)’, ‘Core Values as the Base
of a Partnership(P)’ and a multilayered structure consisting of them in
Figure 1. ‘Organization Ethics’ here means, in the sense described at the
beginning, that is, the fusion of the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ with
the aspect of ‘Ethics of Organization’ triggered by the ‘Creation of
Organization Morality’, and each of the constituent contents in Figure 1 is
also a fusion of these two aspects. Aspects of ‘Organization Ethics’ include
organization-specific characteristics and will differ in individual companies,
organizational bodies, and cooperative systems. On the other hand, the
aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ is an objective code of conduct that is
expected by society and has basically ‘common understanding’. Therefore,
for clarity of explanation, in this paper, I would like to discuss how ‘Ethics
of Concern as an Object of Business’, ‘Engineering Ethics’, and ‘Core Values
as the Base of a Partnership’ should be considered when transferring them 
from the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ to the aspect of ‘Ethics of
Organization’. If I try to explain ‘Organization Belief’ from an objective
aspect, i.e., from the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’, it would be rather
complicated, so I would like to explain it specifically from the aspect of
‘Ethics of Organization’.
Finally, I will summarize ‘the way of thinking’ that runs through the
above discussion as the Perspective of Organization Ethics, and through
clarifying the meaning and significance of this perspective, I will try to see
the scope of the discussion in this paper. At that point, I will also refer to
the Perspective of Applied Ethics, which shares the context of the
discussion, and point out the necessity of layering both perspectives.},
 pages = {71--103},
 title = {組織倫理の構成内容とその議論の射程},
 volume = {63},
 year = {2022},
 yomi = {タニグチ, テルソウ}
}