WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "b0a3e4c2-02dd-4fbc-8b25-2f5cb816b443"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 13, "id": "2000711", "owner": "13", "owners": [13], "owners_ext": {"displayname": "桃山学院大学図書館", "username": "momoyama"}, "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2000711"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000711"}, "author_link": [], "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2004-07-01"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "30", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "桃山学院大学総合研究所紀要", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "A sentence with a psychological (psych) predicate exhibits many peculiar properties. Mysteriously,\nits acceptability is unpredictable by natural language principles. This article examines two\nexamples that are acceptable but seemingly violate such principles. One is the -Criterion, and\nthe other is the Binding Principle (A). Pesetsky (1995) argued that the apparent violation of the\n-Criterion (his Target/Subject Matter, or the T/SM Restriction) can be accounted for by the\nEconomy Principle. In particular, he claimed that an example with the T/SM Restriction is unacceptable\nbecause the head movement involves an uneconomical step. It follows that a sentence\nwith the T/SM Restriction does violate a natural language principle. Thus, the unacceptable sentences\nwith the T/SM Restriction are no longer a mystery because they violate natural language\nprinciples. I argued that the Japanese examples with the T/SM Restriction violate the Economy\nPrinciple in terms of the DP-movement, not the head-movement. I also presented new Japanese\nexamples that do not show the T/SM Restriction (the T/SM Paradox), and argued that the psych\npredicates of those examples have a different structure. The apparent violation of the Binding\nPrinciple (A) (the Binding Paradox) in English was explained by the derivational definition of ccommand\n(Pesetsky 1995). However, the same explanation does not hold for the Binding\nParadox in Japanese. I provided a solution that is consistent with the Mutual C-Command\nRequirement (MCR) (Miyagawa 1989) and the Chain-Binding Mechanism (Barss 1986). Thus,\nthe Binding Paradox also dissolves into a predictable phenomenon that obeys the natural language\nprinciples.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "桃山学院大学総合研究所", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11337282", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1346048X", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Koji ARIKAWA", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_access", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2023-08-30"}], "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "有川 康二.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "240 KB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 240000.0, "url": {"url": "https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000711/files/有川 康二.pdf"}, "version_id": "6e75ffc5-98c6-4aa0-980b-e7faaf96f985"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "T/SM and Binding Paradox in Japanese", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "T/SM and Binding Paradox in Japanese", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "13", "path": ["1691808303699"], "permalink_uri": "https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000711", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2023-08-30"}, "publish_date": "2023-08-30", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2000711", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["T/SM and Binding Paradox in Japanese"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
T/SM and Binding Paradox in Japanese
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000711
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/200071191e25135-9952-481b-ac1b-3ce9f95b7f6a
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
有川 康二.pdf (240 KB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2023-08-30 | |||||||
タイトル | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
タイトル | T/SM and Binding Paradox in Japanese | |||||||
言語 | ||||||||
言語 | eng | |||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
著者 |
Koji ARIKAWA
× Koji ARIKAWA
|
|||||||
抄録 | ||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
内容記述 | A sentence with a psychological (psych) predicate exhibits many peculiar properties. Mysteriously, its acceptability is unpredictable by natural language principles. This article examines two examples that are acceptable but seemingly violate such principles. One is the -Criterion, and the other is the Binding Principle (A). Pesetsky (1995) argued that the apparent violation of the -Criterion (his Target/Subject Matter, or the T/SM Restriction) can be accounted for by the Economy Principle. In particular, he claimed that an example with the T/SM Restriction is unacceptable because the head movement involves an uneconomical step. It follows that a sentence with the T/SM Restriction does violate a natural language principle. Thus, the unacceptable sentences with the T/SM Restriction are no longer a mystery because they violate natural language principles. I argued that the Japanese examples with the T/SM Restriction violate the Economy Principle in terms of the DP-movement, not the head-movement. I also presented new Japanese examples that do not show the T/SM Restriction (the T/SM Paradox), and argued that the psych predicates of those examples have a different structure. The apparent violation of the Binding Principle (A) (the Binding Paradox) in English was explained by the derivational definition of ccommand (Pesetsky 1995). However, the same explanation does not hold for the Binding Paradox in Japanese. I provided a solution that is consistent with the Mutual C-Command Requirement (MCR) (Miyagawa 1989) and the Chain-Binding Mechanism (Barss 1986). Thus, the Binding Paradox also dissolves into a predictable phenomenon that obeys the natural language principles. |
|||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 桃山学院大学総合研究所紀要 巻 30, 号 1 |
|||||||
出版者 | ||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||
出版者 | 桃山学院大学総合研究所 | |||||||
ISSN | ||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||
収録物識別子 | 1346048X | |||||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
収録物識別子 | AA11337282 |