WEKO3
アイテム
現代の流動化する時空間と 身体性の変容 ー欧米の人文地理学・社会学における モビリティ・アプローチの背景とその限界性ー
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000997
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000997fde19920-c772-4a49-9b16-c3e29316af5c
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
p001_野尻亘.pdf (1.4 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-09-13 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 現代の流動化する時空間と 身体性の変容 ー欧米の人文地理学・社会学における モビリティ・アプローチの背景とその限界性ー | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Change of Physicality in Modern Fluid Time and Space: Background and Limitation of Mobility Approach in Anglophone Human Geography and Sociology | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 主題 | モビリティ，非表象理論，身体，場所，人文地理学 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題 | mobility, non-representational theory, body, place, human geography, sociology | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
野尻亘
× 野尻亘 |
|||||
| 著者（英） | ||||||
| 姓名 | NOJIRI Wataru | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The trends in the mobility approach in Anglophone human geography and sociology are reviewed from its backgrounds and limitations. The author compares the characteristics of theories on mobility form the sociologists Urry and Sheller, and the geographers, Thrift, Merriman, Cresswell and Adey. In sociology, the mobility approach concerns the criticism of modernization from post-modernism. From its viewpoints, Speed-up of transport and communication in technological innovations are criticized as a symbol of modernization. However, in geography, the phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty and Spinoza and Deleuze’s concept of affects encourages to form and develop Thrift’s Non-Representational Theory. These theories are served as the background for forming mobility approach regarding the “transformation of physicality in modern timespace. Therefore, the concept of stillness is essential in the proposed notion of mobility, as the emotional concept of affect. Hence, the pain and anxiety of motion and stillness are clarified. In conclusion, the mobility approach is an extension of the development of phenomenology and humanism, and an individual is subjects to research. It differs from conventional positivistic geography in epistemology and methodology. So, the collective viewpoint of region or landscape is not a subject of investigation. In the mobility approach, individuals alternatively form a relational and topological space due to motion and stillness of their body through transportation and communication at an each ‘place’. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 桃山学院大学社会学論集 巻 57, 号 1, p. 1-67 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 桃山学院大学総合研究所 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02876647 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00240577 | |||||
