WEKO3
アイテム
Tense, Subject, and Derivation
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/7340
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/73404903757e-101e-4edf-97b7-a3af28050b47
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004276321.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-03-22 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Tense, Subject, and Derivation | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN1020805X | |||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||
| タイトル | Tense, Subject, and Derivation | |||||
| 著者 |
有川, 康二
× 有川, 康二× Arikawa, Koji |
|||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 値 | 桃山学院大学文学部 | |||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | The central issue of this study is the semantics and the syntax of temporal interpretations of the clausal complement of a verb. Based mainly on English examples, theories of tense hitherto have distinguished three types of the complement-clause-tense interpretation: simultaneous, past-shifted, and double-access. In the simultaneous construal, the denotation of embedded clause tense (∥Te∥) overlaps with the denotation of matrix clause tense (∥Tm∥). In past-shifted, ∥Te∥ precedes ∥Tm∥. In double-access, ∥Te∥ overlaps with both ∥Tm∥ and the utterance time (∥UT∥). A consideration of Japanese examples adds two more: past-double-access and triple-access. Past-double-access is a combination of simultaneous and past-shifted, i.e. ∥Te∥ includes both ∥Tm∥ and some prior time (∥PT∥). Triple-access is a combination of past-shifted and double-access, i.e. ∥Te∥ includes ∥PT∥, ∥Tm∥, and ∥UT∥. This article will attempt to answer the following questions: (i) Why is past-shifted more marked than simultaneous in English?; (ii) Why is past-shifted natural in Japanese?; (iii) How are the multiple-accesses explained?; (iv) Why does English lack past-double access and triple-access?; (v) Why is simultaneous possible in Japanese only when the embedded clause tense is nonpast?; and (vi) Why does stativity matter with simultaneous and multiple-accesses in both languages? We adopt a hypothesis in which temporal-argument phrases of the functional category T^0 interact with various principles and constraints of the generative grammar that have been found to motivate independent phenomena other than tense. [Areas of interest: semantics, syntax] | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
桃山学院大学人間科学 en : HUMAN SCIENCES REVIEW, St. Andrew's University 号 13, p. 45-84, 発行日 1997-09-30 |
|||||
| 表示順 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 4 | |||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00004276321 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09170227 | |||||
