WEKO3
アイテム
政治思想の諸相 : ピューリタニズムと近代デモクラシー(蕗谷硯児教授退任記念号)
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4443
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4443aa9bb3cb-4cf8-4c27-8f04-aec097ec0708
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00005058085.pdf (1.5 MB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-03-21 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 政治思想の諸相 : ピューリタニズムと近代デモクラシー(蕗谷硯児教授退任記念号) | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Aspects of a Political Thought : Puritanism and the Modern Democracy(Special Issue Dedicated to Professor Kenji FUKIYA) | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 自然権 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 選挙権 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 成文憲法 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | パトニー討論 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | ホワイトホール討論 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00240555 | |||||
| 著者 |
村山, 高康
× 村山, 高康× MURAYAMA, Takayasu |
|||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 値 | 桃山学院大学社会学部 | |||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 値 | St. Andrew's University | |||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Article | |||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Much Leveller activity occured in print. The three leaders(John Lilburne, Richard Overton, William Walwyn) were all from 1646 veteran pamphleteers. And they were soon to become experienced petitioners as well. And they were articulate speakers, with others like John Wildman, Thomas Rainborough and other agitators at Putny Debate (from the end of the October to the beginning of the November 1647) and White Hall Debate (from the end of the December 1648 to the beginning of the January 1649) who faced the Army officers like Oliver Cromwell, Thomas Fairfax and Henry Ireton in debate on the form the English constitution furthermore faith or principle of democracy should take. In the several modes they continually claimed that they sought to persuade others to their views, not to impose them through force of arms: their idea was, as famously put by Walwyn, to 'get victory on the understandings of men'. They set out to persuade their contemporaries of four things: that there must be a program of reform in the church-state; that their should be a new constitution of authority designed to carry out and preserve those reforms; that the conditions were such that this new constitution should, could and must be instituted; and (finally) that the fundamental jural facts about being human justified the reforms, the constitution and its institution. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
桃山学院大学経済経営論集 en : ST. ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW 巻 42, 号 3, p. 85-111, 発行日 2001-01-01 |
|||||
| 表示順 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 10 | |||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00005058085 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02869721 | |||||
