WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "cee62a3e-96e2-4f34-963f-0ce1e9321346"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "5843", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "5843"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005843", "sets": ["1424"]}, "author_link": ["8872", "8873"], "item_3_biblio_info_12": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2000-12-20", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "45", "bibliographicPageStart": "27", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "34", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "桃山学院大学社会学論集"}, {"bibliographic_title": "ST. ANDREW\u0027S UNIVERSITY SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_3_description_11": {"attribute_name": "抄録(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper analyzes the influence of reservations to the effectiveness of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (hereinafter referred as \"CEDAW\") and the Optional Protocol to this Convention (hereinafter referred as \"the Optional Protocol\") in guaranteeing women\u0027s human rights. Reservations to treaties allow states to join a multilateral treaty when states agree to the object and purpose of the treaty in general but find that some provisions do not comform to their domestic laws, customs, or practices. At the same time, however, reservations pose the danger of tampering with the object and purpose of treaties, especially when it comes to human rights treaties. I analyze the provisions relating to reservations both in CEDAW and the Optional Protocol, comparing those with other major human rights treaties adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. These treaties include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 1965, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 1984, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989. While CEDAW follows the \"compatibility\" principle established in Article 19 (c) of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969, it fails to provide concrete criteria of the compatibility of reservations. Then I go on to analyze reservations made to CEDAW from the perspectives of geographical distribution, settlement of disputes, and the content of the provisions.", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_15": {"attribute_name": "表示順", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "4", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_16": {"attribute_name": "アクセション番号", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "KJ00004282749", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_8": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "論文", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_description_9": {"attribute_name": "記事種別(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Article", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_3_source_id_1": {"attribute_name": "雑誌書誌ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00240577", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_3_source_id_19": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "02876647", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_3_text_6": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "桃山学院大学社会学部"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "軽部, 恵子"}, {"creatorName": "カルベ, ケイコ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "8872", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "KARUBE, Keiko", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "8873", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-03-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00004282749.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "916.5 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 916500.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00004282749.pdf", "url": "https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5843/files/KJ00004282749.pdf"}, "version_id": "c6bbf7d4-8dfb-42b9-8784-ff26e0c360c0"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "国連女性差別撤廃条約および選択議定書の留保に関する一考察 : 条約の実効性確保の観点から(1)", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "国連女性差別撤廃条約および選択議定書の留保に関する一考察 : 条約の実効性確保の観点から(1)"}, {"subitem_title": "A Study on Reservations made to the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and its Optional Protocol : How to Guarantee the Effectiveness of Treaties (Part 1)", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "3", "owner": "3", "path": ["1424"], "permalink_uri": "https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5843", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2017-03-21"}, "publish_date": "2017-03-21", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "5843", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["国連女性差別撤廃条約および選択議定書の留保に関する一考察 : 条約の実効性確保の観点から(1)"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
国連女性差別撤廃条約および選択議定書の留保に関する一考察 : 条約の実効性確保の観点から(1)
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5843
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/5843141cca57-fd5d-4cc4-b5a3-148594fc2888
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00004282749.pdf (916.5 kB)
|
|
Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2017-03-21 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 国連女性差別撤廃条約および選択議定書の留保に関する一考察 : 条約の実効性確保の観点から(1) | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | A Study on Reservations made to the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and its Optional Protocol : How to Guarantee the Effectiveness of Treaties (Part 1) | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00240577 | |||||
著者 |
軽部, 恵子
× 軽部, 恵子× KARUBE, Keiko |
|||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||
値 | 桃山学院大学社会学部 | |||||
記事種別(日) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 論文 | |||||
記事種別(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Article | |||||
抄録(英) | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | This paper analyzes the influence of reservations to the effectiveness of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (hereinafter referred as "CEDAW") and the Optional Protocol to this Convention (hereinafter referred as "the Optional Protocol") in guaranteeing women's human rights. Reservations to treaties allow states to join a multilateral treaty when states agree to the object and purpose of the treaty in general but find that some provisions do not comform to their domestic laws, customs, or practices. At the same time, however, reservations pose the danger of tampering with the object and purpose of treaties, especially when it comes to human rights treaties. I analyze the provisions relating to reservations both in CEDAW and the Optional Protocol, comparing those with other major human rights treaties adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. These treaties include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 1965, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 1984, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989. While CEDAW follows the "compatibility" principle established in Article 19 (c) of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969, it fails to provide concrete criteria of the compatibility of reservations. Then I go on to analyze reservations made to CEDAW from the perspectives of geographical distribution, settlement of disputes, and the content of the provisions. | |||||
書誌情報 |
桃山学院大学社会学論集 en : ST. ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 巻 34, 号 2, p. 27-45, 発行日 2000-12-20 |
|||||
表示順 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | 4 | |||||
アクセション番号 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | KJ00004282749 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 02876647 |