WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "3375a924-9b04-485c-86b4-078da3dab4cc"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 13, "id": "9475", "owners": [13], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "9475"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:stars.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009475", "sets": ["1863"]}, "author_link": ["657", "12810"], "control_number": "9475", "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2022-02-17", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "4", "bibliographicPageEnd": "103", "bibliographicPageStart": "71", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "63", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "桃山学院大学経済経営論集", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}, {"bibliographic_title": "ST.ANDREW\u0027S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper discusses ethical issues related to ‘the event of a company\nrunning a business’, with a particular focus on the ‘organizational nature’ of\n‘the event’, organization ethics, its constitutive content, and the challenges\nimplied by this subject.\nIn my paper, “Organization Ethics and Strategic Factors for CSR\nManagement” (Economics and Business Review , St. Andrew’s University\nin Osaka, Japan, Vol. 62, No. 4, March 2021), I have been examining the\nimportance of organization ethics for the thinking and practice of ‘CSR\nmanagement in the context of the SDGs and other issues’. The term ‘SDGs,\netc.’ refers to Sustainability, the Triple Bottom Line as its ideological goals\n(the layered economic, environmental, and social values to be achieved), and\nthe Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are the concrete action\ngoals of Sustainability. There, CSR is understood directly and concretely as\n‘management that develops the social responsibility of the company’, and\nmore generally and abstractly as ‘management that develops the social\nresponsibility of the organization or cooperative system’, in other words, I\nplaced the meaning of Organization Ethics (OE) as the ‘core’ of the means\nto achieve this.\nIn the process, the concepts of Ethics for Organization (EFO), Ethics of\nOrganization (EOO), and the creation of Organization Moral (OM) have\nbeen used and examined. The foundation of my research here is the\n‘standpoint of action-subject existence’. The fundamental characteristic of\nthis approach is that we understand the acting subject as a ‘self-creating\ncreature’ that creates itself while being created by the environment, in a\ncontinuous process of ‘becoming to be and being a new becoming’. \nA simpler way to describe it is that it is basically an upward circulation\nprocess between ‘outside-in’ and ‘inside-out’. It is the ‘Creation of\nOrganization Morality’ that acts as a mediator between the first two and\nserves as an opportunity to form the latter process. ‘Ethics for\nOrganizations’ is the object (or it would be said, more accurately, the\nopportunity) to ‘bringing the outside-in’, and ‘Ethics of Organizations’ is\nthat of ‘bringing the inside-out’. If there is an ‘Establishment of\nOrganization Ethics (EFO+EOO=OE)’, and if the cycle forms an upward\ncyclical process triggered by the progressive creation of ‘Organization\nMorality’, then the ‘Deepening of Organization Ethics’ would become an\nactuality. Furthermore, I have confirmed in my previous paper that this\nprocess plays an extremely important role in connecting existing or past\nCSR management with the new CSR management.\nIt is clear that such a function depends on the content of the\ncomposition. Also, the content of the composition will have an impact on\nour lives, the way we live, and the way society is organized. This paper\nwill deal with these issues. First, the discussion of this paper will be\ndeveloped by presenting and explaining the constitutive content of\nOrganization Ethics, namely ‘Organization Belief (O)’, ‘Ethics of Concern as\nan Object of Business (C)’, ‘Engineering Ethics(E)’, ‘Core Values as the Base\nof a Partnership(P)’ and a multilayered structure consisting of them in\nFigure 1. ‘Organization Ethics’ here means, in the sense described at the\nbeginning, that is, the fusion of the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ with\nthe aspect of ‘Ethics of Organization’ triggered by the ‘Creation of\nOrganization Morality’, and each of the constituent contents in Figure 1 is\nalso a fusion of these two aspects. Aspects of ‘Organization Ethics’ include\norganization-specific characteristics and will differ in individual companies,\norganizational bodies, and cooperative systems. On the other hand, the\naspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ is an objective code of conduct that is\nexpected by society and has basically ‘common understanding’. Therefore,\nfor clarity of explanation, in this paper, I would like to discuss how ‘Ethics\nof Concern as an Object of Business’, ‘Engineering Ethics’, and ‘Core Values\nas the Base of a Partnership’ should be considered when transferring them \nfrom the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ to the aspect of ‘Ethics of\nOrganization’. If I try to explain ‘Organization Belief’ from an objective\naspect, i.e., from the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’, it would be rather\ncomplicated, so I would like to explain it specifically from the aspect of\n‘Ethics of Organization’.\nFinally, I will summarize ‘the way of thinking’ that runs through the\nabove discussion as the Perspective of Organization Ethics, and through\nclarifying the meaning and significance of this perspective, I will try to see\nthe scope of the discussion in this paper. At that point, I will also refer to\nthe Perspective of Applied Ethics, which shares the context of the\ndiscussion, and point out the necessity of layering both perspectives.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "桃山学院大学総合研究所"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AN00240555", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "02869721", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_10002_version_type_20": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "谷口, 照三", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "タニグチ, テルソウ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "657", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "TANIGUCHI, Teruso", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "12810", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2022-02-02"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "p071_谷口照三.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "2.3 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 2300000.0, "url": {"label": "谷口 照三", "url": "https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/9475/files/p071_谷口照三.pdf"}, "version_id": "05ba3b0b-69ee-4360-a8d6-761e1ee3c028"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "組織倫理", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "組織固有の信念", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "事業倫理", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "技術倫理", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "パートナーシップへのコア・バリュー", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "組織倫理の構成内容とその議論の射程", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "組織倫理の構成内容とその議論の射程", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "Structural Content of Organization Ethics and the Scope of its Discussion", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "13", "path": ["1863"], "permalink_uri": "https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9475", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2022-02-02"}, "publish_date": "2022-02-02", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "9475", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["組織倫理の構成内容とその議論の射程"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
組織倫理の構成内容とその議論の射程
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9475
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9475040a9fe8-4256-4693-b56a-15203ffc8dd6
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
谷口 照三 (2.3 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2022-02-02 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
タイトル | 組織倫理の構成内容とその議論の射程 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Structural Content of Organization Ethics and the Scope of its Discussion | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 組織倫理 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 組織固有の信念 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 事業倫理 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 技術倫理 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | パートナーシップへのコア・バリュー | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
谷口, 照三
× 谷口, 照三× TANIGUCHI, Teruso |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | This paper discusses ethical issues related to ‘the event of a company running a business’, with a particular focus on the ‘organizational nature’ of ‘the event’, organization ethics, its constitutive content, and the challenges implied by this subject. In my paper, “Organization Ethics and Strategic Factors for CSR Management” (Economics and Business Review , St. Andrew’s University in Osaka, Japan, Vol. 62, No. 4, March 2021), I have been examining the importance of organization ethics for the thinking and practice of ‘CSR management in the context of the SDGs and other issues’. The term ‘SDGs, etc.’ refers to Sustainability, the Triple Bottom Line as its ideological goals (the layered economic, environmental, and social values to be achieved), and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are the concrete action goals of Sustainability. There, CSR is understood directly and concretely as ‘management that develops the social responsibility of the company’, and more generally and abstractly as ‘management that develops the social responsibility of the organization or cooperative system’, in other words, I placed the meaning of Organization Ethics (OE) as the ‘core’ of the means to achieve this. In the process, the concepts of Ethics for Organization (EFO), Ethics of Organization (EOO), and the creation of Organization Moral (OM) have been used and examined. The foundation of my research here is the ‘standpoint of action-subject existence’. The fundamental characteristic of this approach is that we understand the acting subject as a ‘self-creating creature’ that creates itself while being created by the environment, in a continuous process of ‘becoming to be and being a new becoming’. A simpler way to describe it is that it is basically an upward circulation process between ‘outside-in’ and ‘inside-out’. It is the ‘Creation of Organization Morality’ that acts as a mediator between the first two and serves as an opportunity to form the latter process. ‘Ethics for Organizations’ is the object (or it would be said, more accurately, the opportunity) to ‘bringing the outside-in’, and ‘Ethics of Organizations’ is that of ‘bringing the inside-out’. If there is an ‘Establishment of Organization Ethics (EFO+EOO=OE)’, and if the cycle forms an upward cyclical process triggered by the progressive creation of ‘Organization Morality’, then the ‘Deepening of Organization Ethics’ would become an actuality. Furthermore, I have confirmed in my previous paper that this process plays an extremely important role in connecting existing or past CSR management with the new CSR management. It is clear that such a function depends on the content of the composition. Also, the content of the composition will have an impact on our lives, the way we live, and the way society is organized. This paper will deal with these issues. First, the discussion of this paper will be developed by presenting and explaining the constitutive content of Organization Ethics, namely ‘Organization Belief (O)’, ‘Ethics of Concern as an Object of Business (C)’, ‘Engineering Ethics(E)’, ‘Core Values as the Base of a Partnership(P)’ and a multilayered structure consisting of them in Figure 1. ‘Organization Ethics’ here means, in the sense described at the beginning, that is, the fusion of the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ with the aspect of ‘Ethics of Organization’ triggered by the ‘Creation of Organization Morality’, and each of the constituent contents in Figure 1 is also a fusion of these two aspects. Aspects of ‘Organization Ethics’ include organization-specific characteristics and will differ in individual companies, organizational bodies, and cooperative systems. On the other hand, the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ is an objective code of conduct that is expected by society and has basically ‘common understanding’. Therefore, for clarity of explanation, in this paper, I would like to discuss how ‘Ethics of Concern as an Object of Business’, ‘Engineering Ethics’, and ‘Core Values as the Base of a Partnership’ should be considered when transferring them from the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’ to the aspect of ‘Ethics of Organization’. If I try to explain ‘Organization Belief’ from an objective aspect, i.e., from the aspect of ‘Ethics for Organization’, it would be rather complicated, so I would like to explain it specifically from the aspect of ‘Ethics of Organization’. Finally, I will summarize ‘the way of thinking’ that runs through the above discussion as the Perspective of Organization Ethics, and through clarifying the meaning and significance of this perspective, I will try to see the scope of the discussion in this paper. At that point, I will also refer to the Perspective of Applied Ethics, which shares the context of the discussion, and point out the necessity of layering both perspectives. |
|||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 桃山学院大学経済経営論集 en : ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW 巻 63, 号 4, p. 71-103, 発行日 2022-02-17 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 桃山学院大学総合研究所 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 02869721 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN00240555 | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |